Evaluating 3D technology to help determine whether bone fragment morphology metrics could be accurately replicated

Tell us about your research?

My research with the ATLAS Facility (@edinburgh_atlas) evaluated 3D technology to help determine whether bone fragment morphology metrics could be accurately replicated.

Qualitative and quantitative comparisons were performed between non-human skeletal remains, the physical 3D replicas of these remains, and the virtual 3D scans of each. Minor visual and haptic differences were noted including the bluntness of points and varied depth of foramen/cavities of the replica specimens. It was concluded that there were no significant metric differences for any comparisons regarding morphology .

In a wider context, this project has applications in both anatomical education and forensic science, two areas where the general handling of fragmentary bone is typically limited due to the risk of damage or wear over time, attributing to their fragile nature.

What were the highlights?

Through undertaking this research I was able to gain specialist skills related to the field in which I intend to build a career, forensic. I found the work both interesting and fulfilling, and it has helped me to further direct my academic aspirations toward forensic anthropology.

With gratitude to my supervisor, Stephen Maclean (@bonedoctorphd), and the wonderful staff of ATLAS for their support.

I would also like to thank the BMTO for funding this research placement.

View Sade's poster for more information about her research.