Advancing Women in Science: Mentorship, Environment, and Independence

International Women’s Day is a moment to celebrate successful women in science. It is also an opportunity to reflect on the environments and support systems that enable their success.

Today, we feature Isabelle Smith, a third-year PhD researcher at the Zhejiang-Edinburgh Institute (ZJE), whose work in Biomedical Science is already gaining international recognition. Next week, we will talk to Professor Sue Welburn and explore her distinguished career that led to her being honoured with an OBE.

A photo of Isabelle Smith standing next to her research poster

A Childhood Spark

Isabelle’s fascination with science began long before she stepped into a laboratory as a student. Growing up, she often visited her mother’s forensic laboratory. “She does magic on a daily basis,” Isabelle remembers. Watching her mother work sparked a curiosity that would shape the way she approached problem-solving, observation, and inquiry. 

High quality mentorship

For Isabelle, mentorship has been less about instruction and more about cultivating confidence — the confidence to ask bold questions, collaborate across disciplines, and trust her own developing expertise.

Behind every “finished” PhD student, she said, there is a pyramid of support. Too often we celebrate outputs — publications, awards, fellowships — without recognising the layered mentorship that makes this process possible.

Isabelle works with two supervisors: Dr Ruth Morgan, a veterinary clinician, and Prof Paul Le Tissier, a physiologist. Her PhD sits between veterinary practice and laboratory physiology, requiring genuine interdisciplinary collaboration. Clinical insight informs experimental design; laboratory findings refine understanding of equine disease in real-world contexts.

Despite Paul’s responsibilities across undergraduate and postgraduate programmes, he makes time for focussed one-to-one discussion. His assurance that no question is “stupid” has helped Isabelle feel valued at her stage of development rather than measured against some distant benchmark. This kind of mentorship is steady but transformative.

She also described the encouragement she received when beginning her teaching journey as part of her PhD. Entering a classroom at 23 to teach students close to her own age could have been daunting but under the guidance of Dr Laura O’Hara, Isabelle has grown confident in the classroom and recognises it as a space for reciprocal learning. Good mentors do not remove challenge; they make growth feel possible.

Supportive Research Environments

From the outset of her learning journey at the ZJE, collaboration has defined Isabelle’s research identity. Without cross-disciplinary engagement, she reflected, “it’s very easy to get kind of a tunnel vision.” The structure around her — linking veterinary medicine and physiology — ensures her work remains holistic and relevant to the wider equine science community.

But environment is more than research design. It is also culture.

Informal postgraduate discussion groups created small, intentional spaces for dialogue. These forums allowed Isabelle to talk openly about imposter syndrome, career uncertainty and academic pressure. “It was this open dialogue,” Isabelle explained, where students were “a lot less scared to ask questions.”

Such openness reflects a wider norm of transparency and intellectual humility. In her words, nurturing environments are those where “no one’s a finished product” and people are “willing to learn together.” Teaching is framed as a two-way exchange rather than a top-down transaction — “everyone in the classroom should be learning in some way or another.”

These seemingly simple practices — flattening hierarchy, encouraging questions, normalising uncertainty — create psychological safety. They allow emerging researchers not simply to perform, but to develop confidence and professional identity.

Isabelle also draws strength from women who have shaped her journey. “It’s really great having these powerful women and role models in science that are really driving the field—and we definitely need more of them this day and age,” she says. She cites mentors like Professor Sue Welburn, whose trust opened early opportunities, and Professor Anne White, whose expertise in hormone research guided Isabelle through key challenges. Colleagues across ZJE continue to inspire her through collaboration, resilience, and mentorship.

Recognition on an International Stage

Isabelle was recently awarded the Steve Bishop Collaboration for Innovation Award from the British and Irish Society of Animal Science. This accolade honours her innovative approach to animal research. Isabelle will now take her work to UCLA for a month, adapting human cell culture techniques to equine tissues—a move she describes as “a transformative edge” for her research.

Her aim is not merely to learn the technique, but to adapt and translate it for horses — creating a platform that could extend to other domesticated species, including dogs and cats. By the age of 26, she will have worked across three national contexts — the UK, China and the United States — gaining exposure to different academic cultures, laboratory systems and collaborative networks.

For an early-career scientist, this represents more than recognition. It signals growing autonomy and international standing. Competitive awards, research exchanges and defined leadership moments provide the bridge between doctoral training and independent scholarship.

Independence, when carefully supported, becomes not a leap into the unknown but a deliberate step forward. Isabelle is now taking that step — from Edinburgh to California — carrying with her both structured support and emerging confidence.

Celebrating Progress and Possibility

Reflecting on International Women’s Day, Isabelle emphasises confidence, visibility, and mutual support in science:

“International Women’s Day is a reminder that women deserve to take up space in science. You’ve proven you belong there — so be confident, be proud, be yourself and be heard. We need to build each other up, because progress happens when women support women.”

Her journey shows how institutional support, collaboration, and determination can propel early-career researchers to meaningful achievements and help them inspire others. At ZJE, nurturing talent like Isabelle’s isn’t just about research; it’s about building confidence, ambition, and a future where women scientists continue to make an extraordinary impact.

Further information

View a short interview with Isabelle Smith for International Women's Day 2026

Part one - Isabelle Smith for International Women's Day 2026

Particularly  in  my  case, my  PhD  very  much  is  centred around  collaboration  between  my  supervisor, Ruth  Morgan,  who's  a  veterinary  technician, and  my  other  supervisor, Paula  Tier,  who  is  a  physiologist  by  trade. My  entire  PhD  is built  on  the  balance  of  working collaboratively  between vets  who  deal  with  horses, my  research  is  equine  research, and  then  how  we  translate  that  through to  pure  science  background  I'm  in. So  I  think  this  collaboration in  science  is  so  key  and  so crucial  as  there's so  many  different  perspectives  you  need to  incorporate  into your  work,  this  holistic  picture. A  when  you're  in  a  lab  or  department, it's  very  easy  to  get  a tunnel  vision  as  to  say  with your  work  and  maybe  you  don't  see the  relevance  of  findings in  the  bigger  picture. So  collaboration  definitely  in my  work  in  this  respect  has  made  it  much  more holistic  and  relevant  to the  equine  science  community  in  general and  It  also  is  very important  as  science  isn't  linear. We  come  across  lots  of bumps  in  the  road  as  I'm  sure. Again,  anyone  in  the  field  knows. It's  using this  collaborative  nature  to  then  use these  perspectives  and  troubleshoot. Why  is  that  happening? Could  this  account  for  something  else? Again,  it's  a  really  nice  cohesive  way of  pulling  loads  of different  parts  of  science  in build  this  really  nice  full fundamental  research  picture,  very  crucial.

I  think  everyone  says  it, but  women  need  to  build  women  up. There's  a  lot  of  competition, I  think,  as  a  woman, particularly  in  science  because it's  not  necessarily as  easy  to  get  to  the  point. In  science  where  you're not  competing  with  other  women, and  I  think  because  it's  more  of  a  rarity  for a  woman  to  do  well  in  science or  historically  it  has  been. There's  actually  a  lot  of  common  shared themes  that  women  have experienced  themselves  and  can learn  from  each  other and  at  the  end  of  the  day, not  in  competition  necessarily is  what  you  can  learn  from  each  other. But  I  think  my  advice  I'd  give  to women  entering  the  field  is  be  confident, be  proud,  be  yourself,  be  loud. I  think  you  have  to  be  heard. There's  a  lot  of  stigma  around  women  in science  as  the  underdogs and  I  think  you've proven  a  point  to  be  there. You're  worth,  whatever  value you  have  there,  you  can  make  a  real  impact. So  don't  shy  away  from that  and  be  so  proud  to  be a  woman  in  science  and going  against  all  odds to  get  to  where  you  are. Just  be  yourself,  be  confident and  the  rest  go  as  easily  with  it.

Learning  environments definitely  are  subjective  and what  works  for  one  individual  might not  necessarily  work  for  another. I  think  learning  is difficult  and  as  the  age  old  saying  goes, if  it's  easy,  it  would  have  been  done. I  think  the  fact  nurturing environments  that  are  open, not  everyone  knows  the  answer  and the  willingness  of  people to  accept  the  facts, they  don't  have  the  answer  to  everything. I  think  the  transparency  in a  learning  environment  of  saying  that no  one's  a  finished  product and  the  fact  that  people  there should  be  willing  to  learn  together  to get  to the  finished  product  is  very  important.

20  years  time,  I  love  my  work. I  want  to  still  be  in  the  field. I  love  being  in  a  lab. I  love  going  to  conferences and  meeting  people  and  sharing all  these  really  big  ideas and  crunching  down  the  nitty  gritty. I  really  hope  I  don't  know  if I'll  be  a  professor  in  20  years, but  I'd  like  to  think  I  was  on  the  way, but  I  love  what  I  do  and  I can't  imagine  leaving  research  now, so  It's  definitely  not the  easy  route  by  any  means, but  I  have  a  burning  interest and  it's  what  motivates  me  every  single  day, so  I  can't  imagine  being anywhere  else  but  in  a  lab, hopefully  a  bit  more established  than  I  am  now. But  yeah,  I  love  science  and  I  can't actually  imagine  leaving  this  field  now. I  love  it.